← All executive insights

GOVERNANCE & RISK

Agentic AI governance: seven questions leadership should ask before deployment

A decision-focused checklist covering authority, permissions, prompt injection, human control, auditability and safe failure.

Could leadership explain what the agent may do, what it must never do and how an unsafe action would be stopped?
Written and reviewed by Phil Steele, Founder of unouiPublished 14 August 2026 · Reviewed 14 August 2026

THE SITUATION

Why this decision is reaching leadership now

An AI agent can do more than produce text. Depending on its design, it may retrieve information, call software tools, change records, communicate externally or coordinate a sequence of actions.

That capability can reduce manual effort, but it also changes the governance question from ‘Is the answer accurate?’ to ‘What authority has the system been given, and what happens when its plan is wrong?’

THE IMPLICATION

What could happen if the issue remains unresolved?

Excessive permissions

Broad access can turn one incorrect instruction or malicious input into a consequential action.

Prompt injection

Content retrieved from documents, websites or messages may attempt to redirect the agent or obtain information.

Nominal human oversight

An approval step provides little protection if the reviewer lacks time, context, authority or a clear way to challenge the recommendation.

THE DECISION

What a controlled approach requires

01

Boundaries

Define permitted tools, data, actions, limits and prohibited outcomes.

02

Approval

Require meaningful human authorisation before material, external or irreversible actions.

03

Evidence

Retain an audit trail of inputs, sources, decisions, tool calls, changes and approvals.

04

Recovery

Provide safe failure, escalation, rollback and incident-response routes.

QUESTIONS TO TAKE INTO THE ROOM

How confidently could your organisation answer these?

  1. What precise outcome requires agentic behaviour rather than a controlled workflow?
  2. Which systems, records and actions can the agent access?
  3. Can untrusted content influence the agent’s instructions or tool use?
  4. Which actions require informed human approval?
  5. Can every consequential action be reconstructed and explained?
  6. How will success, failure and exception paths be tested?
  7. How can the organisation pause, reverse or safely retire the agent?

FROM QUESTION TO EVIDENCE

An informed question is useful. An organisation-specific assessment is more valuable.

ARI helps leadership establish whether the organisation has the governance, security, information and operating capability to move beyond experimentation responsibly.

Take the free 10-question checkSee the executive reportBuy ARI™ for £3,500