OUTCOME MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK

A recommendation is not complete until progress can be observed.

ARI connects priority action to ownership, intended outcomes, practical measures and retained evidence—so leadership can distinguish activity from progress.

Framework ARI-O01Version 1.0Used during implementation planning
01

Baseline

What is true before action begins?

02

Outcome

What observable change is intended?

03

Owner

Who is accountable for progress and escalation?

04

Leading indicator

What early signal shows movement?

05

Business measure

What value, cost, quality or capacity measure matters?

06

Risk measure

What exposure must remain controlled?

07

Evidence

What record demonstrates action and decision quality?

08

Cadence

When will leadership review progress?

ILLUSTRATIVE MEASURE CHAIN

From governance gap to observable control

FindingAI decisions have inconsistent ownershipActionEstablish decision rights and executive sponsorEvidenceApproved authority map and decision recordMeasureMaterial use cases reviewed before approval

This example demonstrates structure only. Actual measures depend on the organisation, recommendation and available baseline.

Measurement principles

Useful over impressive

Use the smallest set of measures that supports a real decision.

Baseline before benefit

Do not claim improvement without knowing the starting position.

Risk and value together

Efficiency is not success if unacceptable exposure increases.

No guaranteed returns

Forecasts remain assumptions until evidenced through delivery.

TURN PRIORITIES INTO PROGRESS

Use the report internally—or scope implementation support.